Black Neurodivergence, Exceptionalism, and Suicide: What the Research Establishes—and What It Still Cannot Tell Us

Black Americans and autistic people each face documented mental-health pressures that can increase vulnerability to psychological distress and suicide.

Black men are experiencing concerning increases in suicide, while autistic people show markedly elevated rates of suicidal thoughts, behaviors, and suicide mortality. Yet research examining people who are both Black and neurodivergent remains surprisingly limited.

This resource examines what the evidence establishes, what clinicians and communities should understand, and where responsible interpretation must stop.

There is a seductive simplicity in taking two established facts and combining them.

Black Americans experience racism, discrimination, disparities in mental-health care, and increasing suicide rates in several age groups (Pieterse et al., 2012; Stone et al., 2025).

Autistic people experience dramatically elevated rates of suicidal ideation and behavior (Newell et al., 2023; Santomauro et al., 2024).

It would therefore seem reasonable to conclude that Black autistic people must experience an even greater suicide burden.

The problem is that science does not allow us to make that leap without direct evidence.

The existing research tells us a great deal about Black mental health. It tells us a great deal about autism and suicide. It tells us increasingly more about racialized coping, masking, stigma, diagnostic inequity, and barriers to mental-health treatment. It tells us considerably less about what happens when all of those experiences exist in the same person.

That absence matters.

“Black excellence” is not a clinical diagnosis—but the pressures beneath it have been studied

“Black excellence” is a cultural concept, not a psychiatric or psychological diagnosis. There is no accepted clinical construct establishing that Black achievement itself is harmful or that exceptional Black people are psychologically unhealthy.

There is, however, a substantial body of scholarship examining behaviors that can sit underneath cultural expectations of exceptional performance: racial vigilance, stereotype management, respectability politics, high-effort coping, and attempts to prevent racial stereotypes from being applied to oneself.

Research on stereotype threat describes what can happen when people belonging to stigmatized groups enter environments where negative stereotypes about their group could be used to interpret their performance. Awareness of those stereotypes can create cognitive and psychological pressure even when nobody explicitly voices the stereotype in that moment (Spencer et al., 2016).

A review focused on Black, Indigenous, and other people of color found evidence that race-based stereotype threat can affect cognitive performance, including working-memory and executive-function tasks (VanLandingham et al., 2022).

Research on racial vigilance describes another form of adaptation. Lee and Hicken (2016) examined behaviors such as carefully managing appearance and language, preparing psychologically for prejudice, avoiding certain environments, and anticipating discriminatory treatment. In a population-based sample of Black adults in Chicago, greater vigilance was associated with depressive symptoms and poorer physical and self-rated health.

The authors connected these behaviors to the broader history of Black respectability politics: adapting one’s presentation in an effort to reduce mistreatment within racially hierarchical environments (Lee & Hicken, 2016).

The research does not establish that striving for excellence causes mental illness. It does establish that continually managing oneself in anticipation of racial judgment can carry a psychological cost.

High-effort coping has a name: John Henryism

John Henryism describes a pattern of persistent, high-effort coping in response to difficult or chronic psychosocial stressors. The concept has frequently been studied in Black populations because structural barriers can require sustained effort simply to maintain stability, advancement, or control.

The framework is useful because high effort can look highly adaptive from the outside. The person keeps working. Keeps solving. Keeps achieving. Keeps pushing. The question is what maintaining that effort costs over time.

In a nationally representative sample of 1,170 African American and Caribbean Black adolescents, Kahsay and Mezuk (2022) examined associations among John Henryism, major depression, and suicidal ideation. Their findings reinforce the need to understand high-effort coping as psychologically complicated rather than automatically protective.

More recent clinical scholarship continues to describe John Henryism as a paradoxical strategy: persistence and agency can be strengths, while repeatedly having to mobilize extraordinary effort against systemic adversity can create strain (Onyewuenyi et al., 2026).

Achievement is not the pathology. The relevant clinical and public-health question is whether the person must maintain extraordinary effort, vigilance, self-monitoring, or emotional suppression in order to remain safe, respected, employable, or socially acceptable.

Racism itself is a mental-health exposure

Any serious discussion of Black mental health has to treat racism as more than cultural background.

A meta-analysis of 66 studies involving 18,140 Black American adults found a significant association between perceived racism and psychological distress. Associations were particularly evident for depression, anxiety, and other psychiatric symptoms (Pieterse et al., 2012).

Earlier scholarship similarly identified multiple pathways through which racism can affect mental health: unequal access to resources and socioeconomic opportunities, direct psychological and physiological responses to discrimination, and exposure to negative racial stereotypes within a society structured around racial hierarchy (Williams & Williams-Morris, 2000).

This does not mean every Black person’s distress is caused by racism. It means racism is an empirically supported psychosocial exposure that clinicians, researchers, families, and institutions should not omit when trying to understand Black mental health.

What is the actual suicide rate among Black Americans?

Precision matters because public discussions of Black suicide frequently move between two different claims: that Black Americans have the highest suicide rate, and that suicide among Black Americans is increasing at an alarming rate. The second claim is supported. The first is not.

CDC analysis of National Vital Statistics System data found that the age-adjusted suicide rate among non-Hispanic Black Americans increased from 7.3 deaths per 100,000 in 2018 to 9.1 per 100,000 in 2023, a statistically significant increase of 25.2% (Stone et al., 2025).

In 2023, however, the overall age-adjusted suicide rate remained higher among American Indian/Alaska Native people at 23.8 per 100,000 and non-Hispanic White people at 17.6 per 100,000. Black Americans therefore did not have the highest overall racial suicide rate (Stone et al., 2025).

The trend remains deeply concerning because while the overall U.S. suicide rate was essentially unchanged between 2018 and 2023, the Black rate rose significantly. Between 2018 and 2023, suicide rates increased among Black Americans ages 10–24 by 29.4%, ages 25–44 by 29.2%, and ages 45–64 by 17.4%. Among Black adults ages 45–64, the rate increased another 20.3% between 2021 and 2023 alone (Stone et al., 2025).

Black men carry a particularly important part of the suicide burden

Sex differences are substantial. In National Violent Death Reporting System data for 2022, the suicide rate among Black males was 15.1 per 100,000, compared with 3.5 per 100,000 among Black females (Forsberg et al., 2025).

That means Black male suicide mortality was more than four times the Black female rate in that dataset. But comparison requires precision: the 2022 suicide rate among White males was 30.1 per 100,000, and among American Indian/Alaska Native males it was 36.2 per 100,000. Black men therefore did not have the highest male suicide rate by race (Forsberg et al., 2025).

Their vulnerability lies partly in the trajectory: suicide among Black males has increased substantially over recent decades, while research and prevention infrastructure specific to Black men remain comparatively underdeveloped (Adams & Thorpe, 2023).

Black boys and young men deserve particular attention

Researchers have become especially concerned about Black youth. Scholarship has documented sharp increases in suicidality and suicide among Black children, adolescents, and young adults, challenging longstanding assumptions that Black youth were comparatively protected from suicide (Riley et al., 2021).

A 2026 comprehensive review similarly described substantial increases in suicidality and self-harm among African American male youth while noting that research involving Black boys and young men has disproportionately concentrated on externalizing behaviors rather than depression, anxiety, trauma, and other internalizing distress (Barrie et al., 2026).

That distinction has clinical consequences. If distress is primarily expected to look sad, frightened, withdrawn, or verbally vulnerable, clinicians and families may miss distress presenting through anger, irritability, substance use, interpersonal conflict, risk-taking, physical complaints, emotional withdrawal, or attempts to appear unaffected.

Why Black men’s distress can be harder to identify and treat

There is no single explanation for Black male suicide. Research instead points toward interacting structural, cultural, interpersonal, and healthcare factors.

Studies and reviews have identified barriers including racial discrimination, stigma, cultural mistrust, clinician bias, misdiagnosis, traditional masculinity expectations, concerns about vulnerability, financial or structural barriers, and lower utilization of formal mental-health treatment (Hankerson et al., 2015; Johnson et al., 2024).

A 2024 study of African American men found greater endorsement of masculine norms associated with less favorable attitudes toward seeking mental-health treatment (Johnson et al., 2024). Other research has found that race-related experiences and masculine norms can jointly shape perceived barriers to help-seeking among Black men (Powell et al., 2016).

Research on depression among African American men has also repeatedly identified underutilization of mental-health services and concerns about detection, diagnostic interpretation, and treatment engagement (Hankerson et al., 2015; Ward & Mengesha, 2013).

None of these findings mean Black men are inherently reluctant to receive help. A better interpretation is that help-seeking occurs within a history and environment that influence whether seeking help feels useful, culturally safe, affordable, trustworthy, or socially permissible.

Autism carries its own substantial suicide burden

A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data from 48,186 autistic and possibly autistic participants without co-occurring intellectual disability across 36 studies. The estimated pooled prevalence was 34.2% for suicidal ideation, 21.9% for suicide plans, and 24.3% for suicide attempts and suicidal behaviors. The researchers emphasized substantial heterogeneity across studies, meaning these percentages should not be interpreted as universal rates for every autistic population (Newell et al., 2023).

Suicide mortality is also elevated. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis incorporating more than 10 million people estimated that autistic people had approximately 2.85 times the suicide mortality risk of non-autistic comparison populations. The authors estimated approximately 13,400 excess suicide deaths among autistic people globally in 2021, while also emphasizing that the available mortality studies were limited geographically and numerically (Santomauro et al., 2024).

Masking is relevant—but the science requires careful language

Autistic masking or camouflaging generally refers to strategies used to conceal, compensate for, or modify autistic characteristics in order to navigate social expectations. These strategies can include monitoring facial expressions, rehearsing interactions, suppressing stimming, modifying speech, forcing socially expected behavior, or consciously imitating others.

A systematic review by Cook et al. (2021) concluded that camouflaging is frequently described as effortful and has been associated with poorer mental-health outcomes.

Cassidy et al. (2023) found that autistic traits and camouflaging were related to defeat and entrapment, concepts used in contemporary suicide theory. Their study found that the relationship between autistic traits and lifetime suicidality was statistically mediated through camouflaging, defeat, and entrapment. Importantly, the study was cross-sectional and cannot establish that masking directly causes suicide.

Earlier work similarly found associations among camouflaging, thwarted belongingness, and suicidality (Cassidy et al., 2020).

A more recent review cautions against turning these associations into simplistic causal claims. Autistic people may camouflage because environments are stigmatizing or unsafe; camouflaging may itself be stressful; and it may also sometimes facilitate employment or relationships. The relationship between camouflaging and mental health is therefore complex and still being clarified (Khudiakova et al., 2025).

Racial vigilance and autistic masking are not the same thing—but they can conceptually overlap

Black people may monitor speech, appearance, affect, behavior, and physical presentation to navigate racial stereotypes (Lee & Hicken, 2016). Autistic people may monitor speech, body movement, affect, communication, sensory responses, and social behavior to navigate neurotypical expectations (Cook et al., 2021).

Research supports both phenomena independently. What research has not yet adequately established is exactly how those processes interact for Black autistic people.

Existing work on racial vigilance, stereotype threat, autistic camouflaging, and minority stress gives researchers strong reasons to investigate the question of what it costs when the same person must simultaneously manage how their race and their neurotype are interpreted. It does not yet give us permission to pretend the answer is settled.

Black autistic people have also faced diagnostic inequities

The research gap begins before suicide is even measured. Historically, Black children have not always been identified with autism in the same ways or at the same time as White children.

In a study of Medicaid-eligible children, Mandell et al. (2007) found African American children were 2.6 times less likely than White children to receive an autism diagnosis at their first specialty-care visit. Children who were not initially diagnosed with autism frequently received other diagnoses first.

More recent surveillance and healthcare research suggests some racial gaps in autism identification have narrowed as overall recognition has increased. However, disparities remain in particular presentations. Shenouda et al. (2023) found Black children were approximately 30% less likely than White children to be identified with autism without intellectual disability.

This matters to suicide research. You cannot accurately measure suicide outcomes in a population if significant numbers of people in that population were never identified as belonging to it. Late diagnosis, missed diagnosis, diagnostic substitution, unequal access to evaluation, and racial differences in healthcare access can all affect who appears in autism datasets.

We still do not know enough about Black autistic suicide

We have good evidence that suicide risk is elevated among autistic people (Newell et al., 2023; Santomauro et al., 2024). We have strong evidence that suicide rates among Black Americans have increased (Stone et al., 2025). We have evidence that Black men experience substantial barriers to mental-health identification and treatment (Hankerson et al., 2015; Stockwell et al., 2025). We have evidence that racism and racial vigilance affect mental health (Lee & Hicken, 2016; Pieterse et al., 2012). We have evidence linking autistic camouflaging with psychological distress and suicide-related constructs (Cassidy et al., 2023; Cook et al., 2021).

But we do not have equivalent high-quality population estimates answering questions such as: What is the suicide mortality rate among Black autistic adults? What is the suicide-attempt rate among Black autistic men? How does suicide risk among Black autistic adolescents compare with Black non-autistic adolescents? Do racial vigilance and autistic camouflaging interact to increase distress? Are Black autistic people less likely to receive suicide-prevention services before an attempt? Does later autism diagnosis change suicide risk among Black adults?

The absence of adequate intersectional data prevents responsible researchers from simply adding population-level risks together. Being Black is not a numerical multiplier. Being autistic is not a numerical multiplier. Human risk does not work like: Black suicide risk + autism suicide risk = Black autistic suicide risk.

What we can responsibly say is that multiple independently documented vulnerabilities coexist and that the intersection remains insufficiently studied. That should increase research urgency—not encourage unsupported certainty.

High functioning is not a synonym for low risk

A person can be educated, employed, articulate, financially productive, professionally accomplished, socially skilled, or highly intelligent and still experience significant psychological distress.

Camouflaging research is especially important here because compensation can make disability or distress less visible to observers. For Black people, racial vigilance may add another layer: polished language, controlled affect, careful dress, professional performance, emotional containment, or relentless productivity can sometimes function as strategies for navigating racialized environments rather than evidence that the person has abundant psychological reserve (Lee & Hicken, 2016). For autistic people, practiced social performance may similarly obscure support needs (Cook et al., 2021).

The clinical implication is straightforward: capacity should be assessed rather than inferred from achievement.

What clinicians and service systems can do differently

The available evidence supports several practical changes.

Ask about suicide directly rather than waiting for stereotypical presentations of crisis. High occupational or academic functioning should not automatically lower clinical concern when a patient reports hopelessness, entrapment, severe burnout, isolation, or suicidal thoughts.

Assess the environment, not only the diagnosis. For Black patients, relevant assessment may include racism, discrimination, occupational pressure, financial stress, safety, community context, and prior experiences with healthcare. For neurodivergent patients, relevant assessment can include sensory overload, masking, communication demands, burnout, abrupt loss of functioning, unmet accommodations, social isolation, and changes in routine.

Do not mistake reluctance to engage with services for lack of distress. Research on Black men’s mental-health treatment repeatedly identifies structural and relational barriers alongside stigma. Trust has to be built rather than demanded (Hankerson et al., 2015; Powell et al., 2016).

Develop culturally responsive pathways into care. A systematic review of interventions designed to improve Black men’s access to community mental-health services found very limited intervention research—only five eligible studies—but highlighted peer support and opportunities to normalize discussion of thoughts and feelings as promising components (Stockwell et al., 2025).

Adapt suicide-prevention tools for autistic people. Goodwin et al. (2025) worked with autistic adults, relatives, and service providers to adapt safety planning for autistic adults. Participants emphasized developing plans with someone trustworthy, at an appropriate time rather than during peak crisis, and adapting the process to autistic communication and support needs.

Families and communities are part of prevention too

Clinical systems cannot carry the entire burden of suicide prevention. Communities can reduce risk by changing what forms of vulnerability are socially permissible.

A person should not need to become visibly incapacitated before others believe they need help. A Black man should not have to abandon masculinity in order to discuss depression. An autistic person should not have to perform neurotypical distress in order to have suicidal thoughts taken seriously. An accomplished person should not have to lose every visible marker of success before people stop assuming they are fine.

Families can ask about distress without immediately interpreting it as weakness, disrespect, laziness, ingratitude, lack of faith, lack of discipline, or personal failure. Friends can recognize sudden withdrawal, hopelessness, loss of routine, severe exhaustion, escalating substance use, statements about burdensomeness, or major changes in behavior as reasons to engage rather than reasons to judge.

Employers and schools can reduce unnecessary masking demands and create legitimate routes for accommodation before functioning completely deteriorates. Communities can normalize mental-health care before crisis rather than treating professional support as something reserved for people who have already lost control.

Protective factors matter as much as risk factors

Research on Black suicide has identified potential protective influences including social connectedness, family support, cultural identity, community engagement, spirituality for people who find it meaningful, and access to responsive services (Reed et al., 2021).

Protective factors should not be romanticized. Family and religion are not automatically protective. Community is not automatically safe. Strong racial identity does not make someone immune to depression.

Suicide prevention becomes more effective when it asks not only what makes someone vulnerable, but also what gives this particular person reasons, relationships, environments, and practical pathways that make continuing to live more possible.

The research gap is itself a health-equity problem

Adams and Thorpe (2023) argue that Black male suicide prevention needs far greater investment in culturally responsive research and intervention. Stockwell et al. (2025) found remarkably few evaluated interventions specifically designed to improve Black men’s access to community mental-health care.

Autism-suicide researchers continue to call for more representative studies and more interventions designed specifically around autistic needs rather than simply applying general-population approaches. Racial disparities in autism identification further complicate our ability to know who is represented in those datasets (Mandell et al., 2007; Shenouda et al., 2023).

This leaves Black neurodivergent people standing in the center of multiple research literatures while being fully represented in none of them. That is not evidence that their experience is uniquely catastrophic. It is evidence that we have not measured it adequately.

What the evidence allows us to say

The research supports several conclusions: racism and racial discrimination are associated with poorer mental health among Black Americans; racial vigilance and sustained management of one’s presentation can carry psychological costs; high-effort coping can be both adaptive and burdensome; suicide rates among Black Americans increased substantially between 2018 and 2023 even though Black Americans do not have the highest overall suicide rate among U.S. racial groups; Black males die by suicide at substantially higher rates than Black females; autistic people experience substantially elevated suicidality and suicide mortality; autistic camouflaging is associated with poorer mental-health outcomes and suicide-related psychological constructs, although causal pathways remain unsettled; Black people have historically experienced inequities in autism identification and mental-health treatment; and research directly examining suicide among Black autistic and other Black neurodivergent populations remains inadequate.

What the evidence does not allow us to say

We cannot conclude that Black excellence causes suicide. We cannot conclude that masking inevitably produces suicidality. We cannot assume an accomplished autistic person is secretly in crisis. We cannot assume Black men are naturally resistant to therapy. We cannot infer that every racial coping behavior is neurodivergence. We cannot combine Black suicide statistics and autistic suicide statistics and manufacture a Black autistic suicide rate. And we cannot use population research to determine why one individual died.

Those limits do not weaken the conversation. They make it credible.

We need a better question than “Why didn’t they ask for help?”

When someone dies by suicide, one of the most common questions is why that person did not ask for help. The research suggests another set of questions.

Was help recognizable as safe? Was it culturally responsive? Was it accessible? Did the person believe vulnerability would threaten their status, employment, masculinity, credibility, independence, or belonging? Were their support needs visible? Did clinicians understand how their distress presented? Were they autistic without knowing it? Were they masking? Was achievement being mistaken for psychological capacity? Did the people around them know how to recognize distress that remained articulate, productive, disciplined, humorous, professionally successful, or outwardly composed?

These questions cannot explain every suicide. But they move prevention beyond the idea that a person in distress simply failed to reach toward available support. Sometimes the support itself was not designed to recognize them. And sometimes the person became extraordinarily skilled at surviving in a way that prevented anyone—including themselves—from recognizing how unsustainable survival had become.

Scholarly Integrity Statement

This article distinguishes among evidence concerning Black populations, evidence concerning autistic populations, and evidence specifically examining people at the intersection of Black identity and neurodivergence. Findings from separate populations are not combined to generate unsupported estimates of Black neurodivergent suicide risk.

“Black excellence” is treated as a cultural and editorial concept rather than a clinical diagnosis. Concepts including stereotype threat, racial vigilance, respectability politics, John Henryism, autistic camouflaging, defeat, and entrapment are discussed according to their respective research literatures.

Associations between masking, racism, psychological distress, and suicidality should not be interpreted as proof of individual causation. Population-level research cannot establish the cause of a specific person’s death.

This resource is educational and does not substitute for individualized mental-health assessment or clinical care.

References

Adams, L. B., & Thorpe, R. J., Jr. (2023). Achieving mental health equity in Black male suicide prevention. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1113222. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1113222

Barrie, R. E., Wade, S. H., Obioha, C. U., Tchangalova, N., & Whitaker, N. M. (2026). Interventions for African American male youth with internalizing symptoms of depression, anxiety and traumatic stress: A comprehensive review. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 33(3), e70290. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.70290

Cassidy, S. A., McLaughlin, E., McGranaghan, R., Pelton, M., O’Connor, R., & Rodgers, J. (2023). Is camouflaging autistic traits associated with defeat, entrapment, and lifetime suicidal thoughts? Expanding the Integrated Motivational Volitional Model of Suicide. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 53(4), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12965

Cassidy, S. A., Bradley, L., Shaw, R., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2020). Is camouflaging autistic traits associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviours? Expanding the interpersonal psychological theory of suicide in an undergraduate student sample. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50, 3638–3648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04323-3

Cook, J., Hull, L., Crane, L., & Mandy, W. (2021). Camouflaging in autism: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 89, 102080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102080

Forsberg, K., Sheats, K. J., Blair, J. M., Nguyen, B. L., Amoakohene, E., Betz, C. J., & Lyons, B. H. (2025). Surveillance for violent deaths—National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 74(5), 1–42. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/74/ss/ss7405a1.htm

Goodwin, J., Gordon, I., O’Keeffe, S., Carling, S., Berresford, A., Bhattarai, N., Heslop, P., Nielsen, E., O’Connor, R. C., Ogundimu, E., Pelton, M., Ramsay, S. E., Rodgers, J., Townsend, E., Vale, L., Wilson, C., & Cassidy, S. (2025). Adapting safety plans for autistic adults with involvement from the autism community. Autism in Adulthood, 7(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2023.0124

Hankerson, S. H., Suite, D., & Bailey, R. K. (2015). Treatment disparities among African American men with depression: Implications for clinical practice. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 26(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2015.0012

Johnson, A., Amonoo, L., Lofton, S., & Powell-Roach, K. L. (2024). How masculinity impedes African American men from seeking mental health treatment. American Journal of Men’s Health, 18(5), 15579883241278846. https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883241278846

Kahsay, E., & Mezuk, B. (2022). The association between John Henryism and depression and suicidal ideation among African-American and Caribbean Black adolescents in the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health, 71(6), 721–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.07.006

Khudiakova, V., Alexandrovsky, M., Ai, W., & Lai, M.-C. (2025). What we know and do not know about camouflaging, impression management, and mental health and wellbeing in autistic people. Autism Research, 18(2), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3299

Lee, H., & Hicken, M. T. (2016). Death by a thousand cuts: The health implications of Black respectability politics. Souls, 18(2–4), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999949.2016.1230828

Mandell, D. S., Ittenbach, R. F., Levy, S. E., & Pinto-Martin, J. A. (2007). Disparities in diagnoses received prior to a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(9), 1795–1802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0314-8

Newell, V., Phillips, L., Jones, C., Townsend, E., Richards, C., & Cassidy, S. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of suicidality in autistic and possibly autistic people without co-occurring intellectual disability. Molecular Autism, 14, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-023-00544-7

Onyewuenyi, A. C., Herres, J., Obilor, T. I., Villareal, L. G., & Defreitas, S. A. (2026). Balancing strength and strain: A clinical perspective on John Henryism and campus engagement in transition-aged Black youth. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 65(4), 472–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2025.08.001

Pieterse, A. L., Todd, N. R., Neville, H. A., & Carter, R. T. (2012). Perceived racism and mental health among Black American adults: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026208

Powell, W., Adams, L. B., Cole-Lewis, Y., Agyemang, A., & Upton, R. D. (2016). Masculinity and race-related factors as barriers to health help-seeking among African-American men. Behavioral Medicine, 42(3), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2016.1165174

Reed, D. D., Stoeffler, S. W., & Joseph, R. (2021). Suicide, race, and social work: A systematic review of protective factors among African Americans. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2020.1857317

Riley, T., O’Reilly, L., & Adams, S. (2021). Addressing suicide among Black youths: A call to action within and outside clinical practice. JAMA Pediatrics. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2781104

Santomauro, D. F., Hedley, D., Sahin, E., Brugha, T. S., Naghavi, M., Vos, T., Whiteford, H. A., Ferrari, A. J., & Stokes, M. A. (2024). The global burden of suicide mortality among people on the autism spectrum: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and extension of estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Psychiatry Research, 341, 116150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116150

Shenouda, J., Barrett, E., Davidow, A. L., Sidwell, K., Lescott, C., Halperin, W., Silenzio, V. M. B., & Zahorodny, W. (2023). Prevalence and disparities in the detection of autism without intellectual disability. Pediatrics, 151(2), e2022056594. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-056594

Spencer, S. J., Logel, C., & Davies, P. G. (2016). Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-073115-103235

Stockwell, D. W., Roche, M., & Billings, J. (2025). Evaluating interventions that have improved access to community mental health care for Black men: A systematic review. Journal of Mental Health, 34(4), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2390381

Stone, D. M., Cammack, A. L., & Carbone, E. G. (2025). Notes from the field: Differences in suicide rates, by race and ethnicity and age group—United States, 2018–2023. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 74(35), 550–553. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/74/wr/mm7435a2.htm

VanLandingham, H., Ellison, R. L., Laique, A., Cladek, A., Khan, H., Gonzalez, C., & Dunn, M. R. (2022). A scoping review of stereotype threat for BIPOC: Cognitive effects and intervention strategies for the field of neuropsychology. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 36(2), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1947388

Ward, E., & Mengesha, M. (2013). Depression in African American men: A review of what we know and where we need to go from here. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 83(2 Pt 3), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajop.12015

Williams, D. R., & Williams-Morris, R. (2000). Racism and mental health: The African American experience. Ethnicity & Health, 5(3–4), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/713667453

Related Neuro News Resources

Jason Arday: What Is Known About His Resignation, Academic Scrutiny, and Death at 41 — Neuro News Reference Article. This factual companion establishes the documented record concerning Jason Arday and intentionally does not infer his cause of death.

Related Neuro News Commentary — Forthcoming. A long-form Substack commentary will examine Black excellence, neurodivergent masking, competence versus capacity, public humiliation, conditional acceptance, suicide prevention, and what it means to make failure survivable.